4.6 Article

Differential copper-guided architectures of amyloid β peptidomimetics modulate oxidation states and catalysis

期刊

NANOSCALE ADVANCES
卷 4, 期 9, 页码 2196-2200

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2na00161f

关键词

-

资金

  1. SwarnaJayanti Fellowship grant [DST/SJF/CSA-02/2015-2016]
  2. CEFIPRA grant [IFC/A/62T10-3/2020/963]
  3. DST, SERB [CRG/2020/004594]
  4. DBT, India
  5. JNCASR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The differential structures of designer peptidomimetics derived from amyloid beta (Aβ14-23) peptide were manipulated to stabilize distinct Cu oxidation states, which catalyzed different chemical reactions effectively. By incorporating cyclic dipeptide (CDP) and pyrene (Py) units, the Cu-chelation and self-assembly properties of Aβ14-23 peptide were tuned to form nanosheets and micelle-like core-shell structures. These structures demonstrated the ability to stabilize Cu-II and Cu-I states separately and catalyze tandem oxidative-hydrolysis and alkyne-azide cycloaddition reactions.
Orchestration of differential architectures of designer peptidomimetics that modulate metal oxidation states to perform multiple chemical transformations remains a challenge. Cu-chelation and self-assembly properties of amyloid beta (A beta 14-23) peptide were tuned by the incorporation of cyclic dipeptide (CDP) and pyrene (Py) as the assembly directing and reporting units, respectively. We explore the molecular architectonics of A beta 14-23 derived peptidomimetics (Akd(NMC)Py) to form differential architectures that stabilize distinct Cu oxidation states. The fibrillar self-assembly of Akd(NMC)Py is modulated to form nanosheets by the one-off addition of Cu-II. Notably, the serial addition of Cu-II resulted in the formation of micelle-like core-shell architectures. The micelle-like and nanosheet architectures were found to differentially stabilize Cu-II and Cu-I states and catalyze tandem oxidative-hydrolysis and alkyne-azide cycloaddition reactions, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据