4.6 Review

Nanostructured lipid carrier system: A compendium of their formulation development approaches, optimization strategies by quality by design, and recent applications in drug delivery

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 1744-1777

出版社

DE GRUYTER POLAND SP Z O O
DOI: 10.1515/ntrev-2022-0109

关键词

lipid nanocarriers; nanostructured lipid carriers; optimization; novel drug delivery; statistical designs; quality by design

资金

  1. Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia [ISP20-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the formulation development and optimization strategies for lipid-based colloidal carriers, particularly NLCs. The paper discusses various types of NLCs, formulation components, preparation methods, characterization parameters, optimization strategies, toxicity, regulatory aspects, as well as applications in different drug delivery routes.
The lipid-based colloidal carriers, such as nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), nanocapsules, liposomes, and microemulsion, are the latest and significant entrants in the development of drug delivery systems owing to their myriad advantages. The NLCs are second-generation SLNs having unstructured matrix, have high drug loading, and provide long-term drug stability in comparison to SLNs and other colloidal systems, which show lower drug loading and experience burst release/drug expulsion during storage. This review is aimed to summarize the formulation development and optimization strategies for NLCs as reported in the literature collected from authentic databases. Various types of NLCs, formulation components, methods of preparation, characterization parameters, optimization (statistical designs) strategies, toxicity, regulatory aspects, and their applications in oral, parenteral, ocular, pulmonary, nose-to-brain, tumor targeting, and transdermal drug delivery have been dealt in detail. Patents granted on the NLCs have also been enlisted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据