4.7 Article

Synergistic Interaction and Binding Efficiency of Tetracaine Hydrochloride (Anesthetic Drug) with Anionic Surfactants in the Presence of NaCl Solution Using Surface Tension and UV-Visible Spectroscopic Methods

期刊

GELS
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/gels8040234

关键词

tetracaine hydrochloride; sodium dodecyl sulfate; sodium lauroyl sarcosine; drug-surfactant mixed micelle; synergistic interaction

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  2. [IFPRC-174-130-2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the effects of anionic surfactants on the anesthetic drug tetracaine hydrochloride. Through experimental techniques and theoretical models, various parameters were calculated. The results indicate the presence of interactions between the drug and surfactants in mixed micelles, with sodium dodecyl sulfate showing stronger interactions.
Surfactants are ubiquitous materials that are used in diverse formulations of various products. For instance, they improve the formulation of gel by improving its wetting and rheological properties. Here, we describe the effects of anionic surfactants on an anesthetic drug, tetracaine hydrochloride (TCH), in NaCl solution with tensiometry and UV-visible techniques. Various micellar, interfacial, and thermodynamic parameters were estimated. The outputs were examined by using different theoretical models to attain a profound knowledge of drug-surfactant mixtures. The presence of attractive interactions among drug and surfactant monomers (synergism) in mixed micelle was inferred. However, it was found that sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) showed greater interactions with the drug in comparison to sodium lauryl sarcosine (SLS). The binding of the drug with surfactants was monitored with a spectroscopic technique (UV-visible spectra). The results of this study could help optimize the compositions of these mixed aggregates and find the synergism between monomers of different used amphiphiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据