4.5 Article

Smart-Data-Driven System for Alzheimer Disease Detection through Electroencephalographic Signals

期刊

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9040141

关键词

Alzheimer disease; nonlinear multi-band analysis; electroencephalographic signals; classic machine learning; deep learning; wavelet packet; classification

资金

  1. National Funds from FCT -Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [UIDB/50016/2020, UIDB/05757/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully developed a system to differentiate different stages of Alzheimer's Disease using EEG signals, achieving good accuracy in data classification. The results showed abnormal activity in central and parietal brain regions as the disease progressed.
Background: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) stands out as one of the main causes of dementia worldwide and it represents around 65% of all dementia cases, affecting mainly elderly people. AD is composed of three evolutionary stages: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Mild and Moderate AD (ADM) and Advanced AD (ADA). It is crucial to create a tool for assisting AD diagnosis in its early stages with the aim of halting the disease progression. Methods: The main purpose of this study is to develop a system with the ability of differentiate each disease stage by means of Electroencephalographic Signals (EEG). Thereby, an EEG nonlinear multi-band analysis by Wavelet Packet was performed enabling to extract several features from each study group. Classic Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) methods have been used for data classification per EEG channel. Results: The maximum accuracies obtained were 78.9% (Healthy controls (C) vs. MCI), 81.0% (C vs. ADM), 84.2% (C vs. ADA), 88.9% (MCI vs. ADM), 93.8% (MCI vs. ADA), 77.8% (ADM vs. ADA) and 56.8% (All vs. All). Conclusions: The proposed method outperforms previous studies with the same database by 2% in binary comparison MCI vs. ADM and central and parietal brain regions revealed abnormal activity as AD progresses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据