3.8 Article

Mechanics-based design strategies for 4D printing: A review

期刊

FORCES IN MECHANICS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.finmec.2022.100081

关键词

4D printing; Mechanics-based design; Active polymer; Transformation

资金

  1. NSFC [12102329, 11732012]
  2. Young Talent Fund of University Association for Science and Technology in Shaanxi, China [20210505]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four-dimensional (4D) printing is an emerging technology that enables time-dependent transformation of additive manufactured objects. This review classifies reported 4D printing works based on the mechanics principle that yields 2D-3D transformation. It comprehensively explores the interconnections among different 4D printing strategies and identifies challenges in mechanical design, printing techniques, and material synthesis.
Four-dimensional (4D) printing is an emerging technology that aims to endow the additive manufactured objects with the capability of time-dependent transformation. In particular, it provides a flexible and efficient manufacturing strategy by evolving flat precursory patterns into three-dimensional (3D) structures with complex geometry. To equip the precursory structures with desired transformation, it is required to use the principles of solid mechanics to intelligently pre-embed mismatch deformations that can be later activated by external stimuli. In this sense, 4D printing can be regarded as a mechanics-based manufacturing approach relative to conventional fabrication techniques. In this review, we classify the reported 4D printing works from the perspective of mechanics principle that yields 2D-3D transformation. We comprehensively comb the underlying interconnections among different 4D printing strategies, through which readers are expected to obtain a clear picture of how 4D printing is developed step by step. Finally, challenges of current 4D printing approaches are suggested from the aspects of mechanical design, printing techniques and material synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据