4.5 Article

Anastomotic leakage following restorative rectal cancer resection: treatment and impact on stoma presence 1 year after surgery-a population-based study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 1161-1172

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04164-0

关键词

Anastomotic leakage; Restorative rectal resection; Rectal cancer; Stoma; Permanent stoma

资金

  1. Danish Cancer Society [R204-A12668]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anastomotic leakage after restorative rectal resection is a significant predictor for the presence of a stoma 1 year postoperatively. Patients treated with endo-SPONGE for AL may have worse outcomes compared to other anastomosis preserving treatment options, affecting the likelihood of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and stoma presence.
Purpose Anastomotic leakage (AL) continues to be a challenge after restorative rectal resection (RRR). Various treatment options of AL are available; however, their long-term outcomes are uncertain. We explored the impact of AL on the risk of stoma presence 1 year after RRR for rectal cancer and described treatment of AL after RRR including impact on the probability of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and stoma presence following different treatment options of AL. Methods We included 859 patients undergoing RRR in Central Denmark Region between 2013 and 2019. Stoma presence was calculated as the proportion of patients with stoma 1 year after RRR. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to estimate the impact of AL on stoma presence adjusting for potential predictors. Descriptive data of outcomes were stratified for various treatment options of AL. Results The risk of stoma presence 1 year after surgery was 9.8% (95% CI 7.98-12.0). Predictors for having stoma 1 year after RRR were AL (OR 8.43 (95% CI 4.87-14.59)) and low tumour height (OR 3.85 (95% CI 1.22-13.21)). For patients eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy, the probability of receiving it was 42.9% (95% CI 21.8-66.0) if treated with endo-SPONGE and 71.4% (95% CI 47.8-88.7) if treated with other anastomosis preserving treatment options. The risk of having stoma 1 year after RRR was 33.9% (95% CI 21.8-47.8) for patients treated with endoSPONGE and 13.5% (95% CI 5.6-25.8) for patients treated with other anastomosis preserving treatment options (p = 0.013). Conclusion AL is a strong predictor for stoma presence 1 year after RRR. Patients treated with endo-SPONGE seem to have worse outcomes compared to other anastomosis preserving treatment options.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据