3.9 Article

Assessing ecosystem condition at the national level in Hungary-indicators, approaches, challenges

期刊

ONE ECOSYSTEM
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/oneeco.7.e81543

关键词

ecosystem condition; ecosystem condition mapping; national-scale mapping; naturalness; hemeroby

资金

  1. EU [KEHOP-4.3.0-VEKOP-15-2016-00001]
  2. Szechenyi 2020 Development Program
  3. Environmental and Energy Efficiency Operational Programme
  4. Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [OTKA/134329, OTKA/135252]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The availability of spatial information on ecosystem condition is crucial for informing conservation policy. However, implementing practical assessments on a large scale poses challenges in terms of time and cost. This article presents the methods and experiences of mapping and assessing ecosystem condition in Hungary, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches and their potential for addressing challenges in large-scale mapping.
The availability of robust and reliable spatial information on ecosystem condition is of increasing importance in informing conservation policy. Recent policy requirements have sparked a renewed interest in conceptual questions related to ecosystem condition and practical aspects like indicator selection, resulting in the emergence of conceptual frameworks, such as the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting -Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EA) and its Ecosystem Condition Typology (ECT). However, while such frameworks are essential to ensure that condition assessments are comprehensive and comparable, large-scale practical implementation often poses challenges that need to be tackled within stringent time and cost frames. We present methods and experiences of the national-level mapping and assessment of ecosystem condition in Hungary. The assessments covered the whole country, including all major ecosystem types present. The methodology constitutes four approaches of quantifying and mapping condition, based on different interpretations of naturalness and hemeroby, complemented by two more using properties that 'overarch' ecosystem types, such as soil and landscape attributes. In order to highlight their strengths and drawbacks, as well as to help reconcile aspects of conceptual relevance with practical limitations, we retrospectively evaluated the six mapping approaches (and the resulting indicators) against the indicator selection criteria suggested in the SEEA-EA. The results show that the various approaches have different strengths and weaknesses and, thus, their joint application has a higher potential to address the specific challenges related to large-scale ecosystem condition mapping.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据