4.1 Article

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) soybean and corn in Brazil: past, present, and future

期刊

ADVANCES IN WEED SCIENCE
卷 40, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA CIENCIA PLANTAS DANINHAS-SBCPD
DOI: 10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022

关键词

weed resistance; weed tolerance; volunteer plants; GR cultivars; integrated weed management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glyphosate-resistant crops have brought significant changes in weed management worldwide. However, the exclusive use of glyphosate has led to the selection of resistant weeds, posing a major challenge for the sustainability of these crops. Integrated weed management strategies are essential to overcome this challenge.
Glyphosate-Resistant Crops (GR crops) have caused considerable changes in weed management worldwide. In Brazil, GR cultivars of soybean and corn were officially introduced in the 2005/06 and 2011/12 crops, respectively. This technology has radically changed the weed management system, having an enormous impact on national agriculture. The objective of this review was to analyze the general aspects that led to the adoption of this technology in Brazil and present its future consequences and challenges. The adoption of GR soybean and corn was swift and comprehensive. Ten years after its introduction, GR soybean and corn are grown in most areas with these crops in Brazil. This success can be attributed to the reduction of costs, the broad spectrum of control provided by glyphosate, the solution for effective management resistance to ALS and ACCase inhibitors, the excellent managing of weeds that are difficult to control, the reduction of crop injury and carryover problems. However, the exclusive and consecutive use of glyphosate alone resulted in intense selection pressure for resistant weeds to this herbicide, which has become one of the most prominent challenges with these crops. Therefore, the future sustainability of GR soybean and corn will not be possible without the combination with other technologies, within integrated weed management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据