4.0 Article

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles in Healthy, Nondiabetic Young Children

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ENDOCRINE SOCIETY
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvac060

关键词

continuous glucose monitoring; mean glucose; time in range; pediatric diabetes

资金

  1. Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to establish reference glucose ranges in healthy young children without diabetes and found that these children had an average glucose level of 103 mg/dL (5.7 mmol/L), spent most of their time within the range of 70-140 mg/dL (3.9-7.8 mmol/L), and had minimal time below 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).
Context: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly being used both for day-to-day management in patients with diabetes and in clinical research. While data on glycemic profiles of healthy, nondiabetic individuals exist, data on nondiabetic very young children are lacking. Objective: This work aimed to establish reference sensor glucose ranges in healthy, nondiabetic young children, using a current-generation CGM sensor. Methods: This prospective observational study took place in an institutional practice with healthy, nondiabetic children aged 1 to 6 years with normal body mass index. A blinded Dexcom G6 Pro CGM was worn for approximately 10 days by each participant. Main outcome measures included CGM metrics of mean glucose, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability. Results: Thirty-nine participants were included in the analyses. Mean average glucose was 103 mg/dL (5.7 mmol/L). Median percentage time between 70 and 140 mg/dL (3.9-7.8 mmol/L) was 96% (interquartile range, 92%-97%), mean within-individual coefficient of variation was 17 +/- 3%, median time spent with glucose levels greater than 140 mg/dL was 3.4% (49 min/day), and median time less than 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) was 0.4% (6 min/day). Conclusion: Collecting normative sensor glucose data and describing glycemic measures for young children fill an important informational gap and will be useful as a benchmark for future clinical studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据