3.8 Proceedings Paper

Enhancement of the structural and morphological properties of ZnO/rGO nanocomposites synthesized by hydrothermal method

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 324-331

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.634

关键词

ZnO nanorods; Reduced graphene oxide; Crystallite size; Williamson-Hall analysis; Band gap

资金

  1. Africa Graphene Center, University of South Africa Department of Physics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ZnO nanorods combined with different concentrations of reduced graphene oxide were synthesized using the hydrothermal method. The nanocomposites exhibited highly-crystalline structures and rod-like nanostructures. The band gap of the nanocomposite was found to be lower than that of ZnO, indicating its potential for applications.
ZnO nanorods combined with different concentrations of reduced graphene oxide were synthesized using the hydrothermal method. Structural properties of these nanocomposites were studied by X-ray diffraction analysis. Morphological studies on the shape and size of nanorods were carried out by scanning electron microscopy. X-ray diffraction results revealed highly-crystalline nanorods with a hexagonal wurtzite structure. The morphology of as prepared samples is characterized presence of one-dimensional rod-like nanostructures. Crystallite size, stress and lattice strain were determined by Scherrer equation and Williamson-Hall method. The average particle size of samples calculated from microstructural and morphological analyses are highly interrelated. Microraman spectra exhibited both characteristic bands of ZnO and reduced graphene oxide in the low frequency (300-500 cm(-1)) and high frequency (1300-1600 cm(-1)) ranges, respectively, furthermore confirming the efficiency of the hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. The band gap of the nanocomposite is lower (2.96 eV).compared to that of ZnO (3.10 eV), as determined from the analysis of UV absorbance spectra. (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据