4.5 Article

A hybrid similarity measure method for patent portfolio analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 1108-1130

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.09.006

关键词

Patent analysis; Similarity measure; Text mining; Bibliometrics

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2014AA015105]
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP140101366]
  3. National Science Foundation of China Yong Funds [71103015]
  4. Basic Research Foundation of Beijing Institute of Technology [20152142010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Similarity measures are fundamental tools for identifying relationships within or across patent portfolios. Many bibliometric indicators are used to determine similarity measures; for example, bibliographic coupling, citation and co-citation, and co-word distribution. This paper aims to construct a hybrid similarity measure method based on multiple indicators to analyze patent portfolios. Two models are proposed: categorical similarity and semantic similarity. The categorical similarity model emphasizes international patent classifications (IPCs), while the semantic similarity model emphasizes textual elements. We introduce fuzzy set routines to translate the rough technical (sub-) categories of IPCs into defined numeric values, and we calculate the categorical similarities between patent portfolios using membership grade vectors. In parallel, we identify and highlight core terms in a 3 level tree structure and compute the semantic similarities by comparing the tree-based structures. A weighting model is designed to consider: 1) the bias that exists between the categorical and semantic similarities, and 2) the weighting or integrating strategy for a hybrid method. A case study to measure the technological similarities between selected firms in China's medical device industry is used to demonstrate the reliability our method, and the results indicate the practical meaning of our method in a broad range of informetric applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据