4.7 Article

Upper ocean response to typhoon Kalmaegi (2014)

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
卷 121, 期 8, 页码 6520-6535

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JC012064

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program [2013CB430302]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41321004, 91528304, 91128204, 41476021]
  3. National Programme on Global Change and Air-Sea Interaction [GASI-IPOVAI-04]
  4. Scientific Research Fund of the Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration
  5. XMU graduate school

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Typhoon Kalmaegi passed over an array of buoys and moorings in the northern South China Sea in September 2014, leaving a rare set of observations on typhoon-induced dynamical and thermohaline responses in the upper ocean. The dynamical response was characterized by strong near-inertial currents with opposite phases in the surface mixed layer and in the thermocline, indicating the dominance of the response by the excitation of the first baroclinic mode. The thermohaline response showed considerable changes in the mean fields in addition to a near-inertial oscillation. In particular, temperature and salinity anomalies generally exhibited a three-layer vertical structure, with the surface layer becoming cooler and saltier, the subsurface layer warmer and fresher, and the lower layer cooler and saltier again. The response in the surface and subsurface layers was much stronger to the right of the typhoon track, while that in the lower layer was stronger along the track and to the left. These features of the upper ocean response were grossly reproduced by a three-dimensional numerical model. A model-based heat budget analysis suggests that vertical mixing was mainly responsible for the surface cooling and subsurface warming, while upwelling was the cause of cooling from below. Both observations and model results indicate that the whole upper ocean experienced an overall cooling in the wake of typhoon Kalmaegi.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据