3.8 Proceedings Paper

Real-time estimation of upper limbs kinematics with IMUs during typical industrial gestures

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.303

关键词

IMU; Industry 4.0; human-robot collaboration; sensor fusion; joint kinematics; inertial; stereophotogrammetry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study validated an IMU-based method for real-time estimation of upper limb kinematics during typical gestures required for industrial assembly tasks. Through the use of IMUs fixed on the upper body of six participants, shoulder and elbow angles were successfully assessed. The results confirmed the suitability of the proposed method for human-robot collaboration in an industrial context.
In the context of Industry 4.0, collaborative robotics can be improved by implementing appropriate reactive behavior schemes between human and the robot within the shared workspace. Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) are widely used for real-time capturing of the human motion in clinical and sports applications, while less attention has been dedicated to IMUs for human-robot interactions in manufacturing industrial field. The aim of the present study was to validate an IMU-based method for real-time estimation of upper limbs kinematics during typical gestures required for industrial assembly tasks. To avoid ferro-magnetic disturbances typical of manufacturing environments, the magnetometers were excluded from the estimate of IMUs orientations. Shoulder and elbow angles were assessed in real-time during pick and place tasks through three IMUs fixed on the upper body of six participants. Results were validated through a stereophotogrammetric motion capture system. Errors associated to the proposed method were moderate and amounted to 2.4 and 3.5 deg on average for shoulder elevation and elbow flexion-extension angles, respectively, confirming their suitability for an industrial context of human-robot collaboration. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据