4.7 Article

Logarithmic velocity structure in the deep hypolimnetic waters of Lake Michigan

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
卷 121, 期 1, 页码 949-965

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014JC010506

关键词

boundary layers; drag; roughness; quagga mussels; Lake Michigan

资金

  1. Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant College Program [NAOAR4170095]
  2. NSF [OCE-1030842]
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [1030842] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The characteristics of the bottom boundary layer are reported from a Lake Michigan field study carried out in deep hypolimnetic waters (55 m depth) during the stratified period (June-September 2012). The sandy substrate at the measurement site was densely covered with invasive quagga mussels (mean size: 1.6 cm; mean density: 10,000 mussels m(-2)). The measurements reveal a sluggish, compact bottom boundary layer, with flow speeds at 1 mab less than 5 cm s(-1) for most of the period, and a dominance of subinertial energy. A downwelling event caused the largest currents observed during the deployment (10 cm s(-1) at 1 mab) and a logarithmic layer thickness of 15 m. In spite of the weak flow, logarithmic profile fitting carried out on high-resolution, near-bed velocity profiles show consistent logarithmic structure (90% of profiles). Flow was dominated by subinertial energy but strong modified by near-inertial waves. Fitted drag coefficients and roughness values are C-d1m = 0.004 and z(0) = 0.12 cm, respectively. These values increase with decreasing flow speed, but approach canonical values for 1 mab flow speeds exceeding 4 cm s(-1). The estimated vertical extent of the logarithmic region was compact, with a mean value of 1.2 m and temporal variation that is reasonably described by Ekman scaling, 0.07 u(*)/f, and the estimated overall Ekman layer thickness was generally less than 10 m. Near-bed dissipation rates inferred from the law of the wall were 10(-8)-10(-7) W kg(-1) and turbulent diffusivities were 10(-4)-10(-3) m(2)s(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据