4.5 Article

Nanoscratching of iron: A molecular dynamics study of the influence of surface orientation and scratching direction

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 103, 期 -, 页码 77-89

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.03.011

关键词

Molecular dynamics; Nanoscratching; Pile-up; Iron; Dislocations; Plasticity

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Sonderforschungsbereich 926]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using molecular dynamics simulation we study scratching of Fe crystals by a hard repulsive tip. Three surface orientations - (100), (110), and (111) - are studied with two scratch directions in each case. We take care to analyze the projected normal and transverse contact areas properly to take the loss of contact of the tip to the substrate beneath it and its increased contact to the pile-up into account. We find that the form of the pile-up generated depends strongly on the surface orientation and scratch direction; this dependence is analyzed with the help of the dominant slip system in bcc Fe. The normal force to keep the tip at fixed depth and the transverse scratching force vary by only 15% between the different scratch systems investigated. The normal contact area decreases considerably during the initial stage of scratching as the trailing part of the tip loses contact with the substrate. The normal hardness shows similarly small variations between the different systems studied and is smaller than the hardness during the indentation process. The transverse contact area increases continuously during the scratch as the pile-up is generated. As a consequence the tangential hardness varies more strongly (by 26%) between the systems studied. For the (100)[011] scratch system we analyze the depth dependence of scratching. We find the friction coefficient to increase with scratch depth. The dependence of the normal and tangential hardness on depth are discussed with the help of the variation of the respective projected areas with depth. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据