4.6 Article

Synthetic Hall ladder with tunable magnetic flux

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 105, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.043306

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014-H1A8A1021987, NRF-5452018R1A2B3003373, NRF-2019M3E4A1080399, NRF-2019M3E4A1080400]
  2. Institute for Ba-sic Science in Korea [IBS-R009-D1]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019M3E4A1080399, 2019M3E4A1080400] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes a synthetic three-leg Hall ladder system with a tunable magnetic flux for neutral Yb-173 atoms in a one-dimensional optical lattice. The controllable magnetic flux is achieved through Raman couplings between spin states, and the quench dynamics of the system were investigated under various interleg link configurations, showing substantial damping in certain cases.
We describe a synthetic three-leg Hall ladder system with a tunable magnetic flux for neutral Yb-173 atoms in a one-dimensional optical lattice. The ladder legs are formed by three hyperfine ground spin states of the atoms, and the complex interleg links are generated through Raman couplings between the spin states using multiple laser beams. The effective magnetic flux through a ladder plaquette phi is controlled by the angles of the Raman laser beams with the lattice axis. We investigate the quench dynamics of the Hall ladder system for phi approximate to pi/2, pi/2, and 2 pi/3 after a sudden application of the Raman coupling in various interleg link configurations. The semiclassical trajectory of the atoms in the plane of the spin composition and lattice position exhibits the characteristic motion of the effective magnetic field. In a tube configuration with the three legs cyclically linked, the quench evolution was observed to be substantially damped, which is attributed to the random flux threading the Hall tube.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据