4.6 Article

Scalable Production of Genetically Engineered Nanofibrous Macroscopic Materials via Filtration

期刊

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 3, 期 5, 页码 733-741

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00437

关键词

curli fibers; amyloids; filtration; protein-based materials; thin films

资金

  1. Fonds de Recherche Nature et Technologies du Quebec (FRQNT)
  2. NSF [1410751]
  3. Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1410751] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As interest in using proteins to assemble functional, biocompatible, and environmentally friendly materials is growing, developing scalable protocols for producing recombinant proteins with customized functions coupled to straightforward fabrication processes is becoming crucial. Here, we use E. coli bacteria to produce amyloid protein nanofibers that are key constituents of the biofilm extracellular matrix and show that protein nanofiber aggregates can be purified using a fast and easily accessible vacuum filtration procedure. With their extreme resistance to heat, detergents, solvents, and denaturing agents, engineered curli nanofibers remain functional throughout the rigorous processing and can be used to assemble macroscopic materials directly from broth culture. As a demonstration, we show that engineered curli nanofibers can be fabricated into self-standing films while maintaining the functionality of various fused domains that confer new specific binding activity to the material. We also demonstrate that purified curli fibers can be disassembled, reassembled into thin films, and recycled for further materials processing. Our scalable approach, which combines established purification techniques for amyloid fibers, is applicable to a new class of recombinant amyloid proteins whose sequence can be easily tailored for diverse applications through genetic

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据