4.4 Review

Basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool?

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1186/s13601-016-0098-7

关键词

Basophil activation test; CD63; CD203c; Food allergy; Diagnosis; Immunotherapy; Peanut allergy

类别

资金

  1. Asthma UK [MRC-Asthma UK Centre] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/M008517/1, G1000758, G0902018] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MR/M008517/1, G0902018] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [MR/M008517/1, G1000758, G0902018] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold-standard to diagnose food allergy; however, it is a labour and resource-intensive procedure with the risk of causing an acute allergic reaction, which is potentially severe. Therefore, OFC are reserved for cases where the clinical history and the results of skin prick test and/or specific IgE do not confirm or exclude the diagnosis of food allergy. This is a significant proportion of patients seen in Allergy clinics and results in a high demand for OFC. The basophil activation test (BAT) has emerged as a new diagnostic test for food allergy. With high diagnostic accuracy, it can be particularly helpful in the cases where skin prick test and specific IgE are equivocal and may allow reducing the need for OFC. BAT has high specificity, which confers a high degree of certainty in confirming the diagnosis of food allergy and allows deferring the performance of OFC in patients with a positive BAT. The diagnostic utility of BAT is allergen-specific and needs to be validated for different allergens and in specific patient populations. Standardisation of the laboratory methodology and of the data analyses would help to enable a wider clinical application of BAT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据