4.7 Article

Philippine Sea and East Asian plate tectonics since 52 Ma constrained by new subducted slab reconstruction methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
卷 121, 期 6, 页码 4670-4741

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JB012923

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We reconstructed Philippine Sea and East Asian plate tectonics since 52 Ma from 28 slabs mapped in 3-D from global tomography, with a subducted area of similar to 25% of present-day global oceanic lithosphere. Slab constraints include subducted parts of existing Pacific, Indian, and Philippine Sea oceans, plus wholly subducted proto-South China Sea and newly discovered East Asian Sea. Mapped slabs were unfolded and restored to the Earth surface using three methodologies and input to globally consistent plate reconstructions. Important constraints include the following: (1) the Ryukyu slab is similar to 1000 km N-S, too short to account for similar to 20 degrees Philippine Sea northward motion from paleolatitudes; (2) the Marianas-Pacific subduction zone was at its present location (+/- 200 km) since 48 +/- 10 Ma based on a > 1000 km deep slab wall; (3) the 8000 x 2500 km East Asian Sea existed between the Pacific and Indian Oceans at 52 Ma based on lower mantle flat slabs; (4) the Caroline back-arc basin moved with the Pacific, based on the overlapping, coeval Caroline hot spot track. These new constraints allow two classes of Philippine Sea plate models, which we compared to paleomagnetic and geologic data. Our preferred model involves Philippine Sea nucleation above the Manus plume (0 degrees /150 degrees E) near the Pacific-East Asian Sea plate boundary. Large Philippine Sea westward motion and post-40 Ma maximum 80 degrees clockwise rotation accompanied late Eocene-Oligocene collision with the Caroline/Pacific plate. The Philippine Sea moved northward post-25 Ma over the northern East Asian Sea, forming a northern Philippine Sea arc that collided with the SW Japan-Ryukyu margin in the Miocene (similar to 20-14 Ma).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据