4.7 Article

Failure characteristics of two porous sandstones subjected to true triaxial stresses

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
卷 121, 期 9, 页码 6477-6498

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JB012979

关键词

porous sandstones; true triaxial testing; failure characteristics; compaction bands; intermediate principal stress

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-0940323]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted an extensive suite of true triaxial experiments in two porous sandstones, Bentheim (porosity approximate to 24%) and Coconino (17.5%). Our experiments demonstrate that failure of both sandstones is not only a function of sigma(3) but also of sigma(2). For a given sigma(3), sigma(1) at failure (sigma(1,peak)) increases as sigma(2) is raised above sigma(3) between tests. The sigma(1,peak) reaches a peak as sigma(2) is about halfway between sigma(3) and sigma(1) and then gradually decreases such that when sigma(2)approximate to sigma(1,peak), it approaches its initial magnitude when sigma(2)=sigma(3). For a constant sigma(3), failure-plane angle increases with sigma(2) by a maximum of less than 10 degrees as sigma(2) rises from sigma(2)=sigma(3) to sigma(2)=sigma(1,peak). The effect of sigma(2) on both failure level and failure-plane angle is stronger in the lower-porosity Coconino sandstone than in the Bentheim sandstone. The sigma(2) dependence of failure mode in the Bentheim is different than Coconino over the same sigma(3) range. Both sandstones failed dilatantly at low sigma(3) magnitudes. However, at high sigma(3) (100-120MPa), Bentheim sandstone developed shear-enhanced compaction bands, followed by pure compaction bands at sigma(3)=150MPa. Compaction bands were not observed in the Coconino. Microscopic observations via SEM reveal that tensile microcracking is dominant when shear banding occurs (under low sigma(3)), while pervasive grain crushing and pore collapse inside compaction bands are observed at high sigma(3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据