4.5 Article

Novel 2,4-Diarylaminopyrimidine Derivatives Containing Pyridine Moiety: Design, Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Biological Evaluation

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL CHEMISTRY
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 2202132-2202140

出版社

CHINESE JOURNAL STRUCTURAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.14102/j.cnki.0254-5861.2011-3283

关键词

pyrimidine; pyridine; synthesis; X-ray diffraction; antitumor activity

资金

  1. Youth National Natural Science Foundation of China [21807055]
  2. General Project of Education Department of Liaoning Province [LJC201907]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2019-ZD-0191]
  4. College Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Liaoning University [D202011280014195636]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of 2,4-diarylaminopyrimidine derivatives with pyridine structure were synthesized and their crystal structures were determined by X-ray diffraction. The bioassay results demonstrated that these compounds exhibited potential antiproliferative activities against various cell lines.
A series of 2,4-diarylaminopyrimidine derivatives containing pyridine structure were designed and synthesized. The crystal structures of compounds 5d and 5e were obtained from X-ray diffraction. The crystal structure of 5d (C25H20ClFN6O2) belongs to the monoclinic system, space group P2(1)/c with a = 11.0500(10), b = 18.3045(17), c = 13.5646(9) angstrom and beta = 122.806(5)degrees. 5e (C25H19ClF2N6O2) is of monoclinic system, space group P2(1)/c with a = 10.9998(18), b = 18.517(3), c = 13.6355(16) angstrom and ) beta = 123.315(9)degrees. The bioassay results showed all of the target compounds exhibited potential antiproliferative activities against MKN-45, HT-29, A549, K562 and GIST882 cell lines. Among them, compounds 5a, 5c and 5e exhibited remarkable inhibitory activities against GIST882, K562 and A549 cell lines with IC50 values of 0.68, 0.38 and 0.60 mu M, respectively, which were comparable to that of the positive control foretinib.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据