4.5 Article

Modeling the growth and migration of sandy shoals on ebb-tidal deltas

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE
卷 121, 期 7, 页码 1351-1372

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JF003823

关键词

tidal inlet system; morphodynamic modeling; sediment transport; wave-topography interaction; ebb-tidal delta breaching

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [821.01.010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coherent sandy shoals that migrate toward the downdrift coast are observed on many ebb-tidal deltas. In this study, processes that cause the growth and migration of shoals on ebb-tidal deltas are identified. Moreover, the effect of the incident wave energy and the tidal prism of an inlet on the migration speed of these shoals is investigated. For this, a numerical morphodynamic model with an idealized geometric setup is employed. The model computes the bed level evolution due to local erosion and deposition of sand driven by tides and waves. Analysis of model results shows that shoals grow when there is a local imbalance between the bathymetry and the wave conditions, which in this study was imposed by manually breaching the ebb-tidal delta or by adding storms to the wave forcing. There are thresholds for shoal formation that depend on the distribution of the sand and the incident wave energy. Wave refraction over the shoals leads to focusing of wave energy and increased wave energy dissipation around the location of the local minimum water depth. This generates residual currents over the shoal and increased skin friction toward the local minimum water depth, which together create a sand transport pattern that induces the growth and migration of the shoal. Sand transport due to asymmetric waves contributes to keeping the shoal a coherent structure. The shoal migration speed increases with increasing incident wave energy and decreasing tidal prism; this is because tidal residual currents oppose the wave-driven residual currents that cause shoal migration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据