4.7 Article

Recycling of full components of polyester/cotton blends catalyzed by betaine-based deep eutectic solvents

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107512

关键词

Polyester/cotton blends ; Polyethylene terephthalate (PET); Deep eutectic solvents; Full component recycling; Mechanism

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC1908204]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22178364, 21776289, 21978291, 21878292, 21908232, 22178358]
  3. Joint Fund of Innovation Academy for Green Manufacture [IAGM2020C21, IAGM2020C12]
  4. K. C. Wong Education Foundation [GJTD-2018-04]
  5. Inter-national Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [122111KYSB20190060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of an environmental methodology for PET degradation and separation from cotton is important for utilizing waste polyester/cotton blends. In this study, a betaine based deep eutectic solvent was used to selectively degrade PET fibers, resulting in purified monomer for PET repolymerization and high cotton recovery.
The development of an environmental methodology for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) degradation and separation from cotton is significant for the full utilization of waste polyester/cotton blends (PCBs). Therefore, it is crucial to find a catalyst that can efficiently catalyze PET degradation and completely separate from cotton. In this work, betaine based deep eutectic solvents (DESs) were first synthesized and innovatively used for selective degradation of PET fibers from PCBs. As a result, PET fiber was degraded completely, a purified monomer bis (2-hydroxyethyl terephthalate) (BHET) with a yield of 85% was obtained that could be repolymerized to produce PET, and 95% of the cotton was recycled and maintained its original structural integrity. Meanwhile, the synergistic mechanism was also proposed by in-situ IR, H-1-NMR and DFT calculations. This work provides a new approach to recycle full components of waste PCBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据