4.8 Article

A Short Peptide of Autotransporter Ata Is a Promising Protective Antigen for Vaccination Against Acinetobacter baumannii

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.884555

关键词

Acinetobacter baumannii; acinetobacter trimeric autotransporter adhesin (Ata); CpG; CTB; subunit vaccine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that the trimeric autotransporter protein Ata(α) of Acinetobacter baumannii is a promising vaccine target for A. baumannii infections. The fusion protein CTB-Ata(α) induces immune responses, reduces bacterial loads, and provides broad protection in mice.
With the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains, Acinetobacter baumannii infection is becoming a thorny health problem in hospitals. However, there are no licensed vaccines against A. baumannii. Acinetobacter trimeric autotransporter (Ata) is an important known virulence factor located on the outer membrane of bacteria. Herein, we carried out a series of experiments to test the immunogenicity of a short C-terminal extracellular region of Ata (Ata(alpha), only containing 39 amino acids) in a murine model. The short peptide Ata(alpha) was fused with the cholera toxin B subunit (CTB), which has been reported to have immunoadjuvant activity. The fusion protein showed no inflammation and organ damages, and have the ability to elicit both Th1 and Th2 immune responses in mice. The bactericidal activities against A. baumannii and prophylactic effects of the fusion protein were further evidenced by a significant reduction in the bacterial load in the organs and blood. In addition, the candidate vaccine could provide broad protection against lethal challenges with a variety of A. baumannii strains. Moreover, when CpG was added on the basis of aluminum adjuvant, the immune response, especially cellular immunity, could be further strengthened. Overall, these results revealed that the Ata(alpha) is a promising vaccine target against A. baumannii infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据