3.8 Article

Lateralized ante mortem and post mortem pathology in a case of Lewy body disease with corticobasal syndrome

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12294

关键词

alpha-synuclein; Alzheimer's disease; cerebrospinal fluid; corticobasal syndrome; flortaucipir; Lewy body dementia; neuropathology

资金

  1. AAN [CRTS 2059]
  2. National Institutes of Health [P30AG072979, AG043503, AG062429, AG062418, NS053488, NS109260]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reported a case with overlapping clinical features of synucleinopathy and tauopathy, and through biomarker characterization and post-mortem sampling, showed lateralized tau and alpha-synuclein pathology suggesting possible synergistic relationships.
Introduction Lewy body diseases are pathologically characterized by alpha-synuclein pathology. Alzheimer's disease (AD) co-pathology can influence phenotypes. In vivo AD biomarkers can suggest the presence of this co-pathology in unusual cases, but pathological validation remains essential. Methods This patient originally presented with corticobasal syndrome and later developed visual hallucinations and parkinsonism consistent with a synucleinopathy. The patient underwent CSF sampling, 18F-flortaucipir PET scanning, and brain donation with bilateral regions available for digital histological analysis. Results CSF A beta 42 and t-tau were in the AD range. 18F-flortaucipir scanning showed right-lateralized retention in all lobes (t = 4.3-10.0, P < .006). Neocortical stage Lewy body pathology and high levels of AD neuropathological changes were present at autopsy. There was right lateralization of alpha-synuclein and tau pathology (T value = 3.1, P value = .007 and T value = 3.3, P value = .004 respectively). Discussion This case with overlapping tauopathy and synucleinopathy clinical features had in-depth biomarker characterization and rare bilateral post-mortem sampling showing lateralized tau and alpha-synuclein pathology suggesting possible synergistic relationships.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据