4.6 Article

The attachment process of rocket-triggered lightning dart-stepped leaders

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 121, 期 2, 页码 853-871

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JD024269

关键词

lightning

资金

  1. DARPA NIMBUS program
  2. NASA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Time-correlated 1.54 mu s high-speed video frames, channel-base current and current derivative (dI/dt), and electric field derivative (dE/dt) measurements are used to analyze the attachment process of triggered lightning dart-stepped leaders. Lengths, speeds, and durations of the upward-connecting positive leaders propagating from the launching structure are measured and calculated. The leader burst occurring immediately preceding the dE/dt slow front is demonstrated to be a distinctly different process from the preceding downward dart-stepped leader steps and is associated with the fast increase in channel-base current due to the initial interactions of the downward and upward leader streamer zones. Locations of the leader burst pulses are found to occur within or immediately above the connection region. Pulses superimposed on the dE/dt slow front are shown to occur after the initial connection between the downward and upward leaders and are associated with kiloampere-scale increases in the channel-base current. Subsequent fast-transition pulses are found to produce multiple kiloampere-scale increases in the channel-base current. Observed time delays between dE/dt and dI/dt peaks for slow front and fast-transition pulses confirm the existence of an elevated junction point between the downward and upward leaders. Average downward current wave speeds for fast-transition pulses are found to be a factor of 2 to 2.5 faster than those for slow-front pulses. For 51 dart-stepped leader events, the average total duration of the attachment process, starting with the initial fast current increase and ending with the peak of the final dI/dt fast-transition pulse, is measured to be 1.77 mu s.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据