4.6 Article

Understanding electrochemical properties of supported lipid bilayers interfaced with organic electronic devices

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 10, 期 20, 页码 8050-8060

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2tc00826b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Army Research Office [W911NF-18-2-0152]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the relationship between changes in SLB quality and impedance output was explored using experimental data and numerical simulation. The impact of microelectrode area on sensor sensitivity to changes in SLB state was also investigated.
Supported lipid bilayers (SLBs) are cell-membrane-mimicking platforms of varying biological complexity, that can be formed on solid surfaces and used to characterise the properties of the plasma membrane or to study membrane interactions at the molecular level. The incorporation of microfabricated electrodes and transistors has allowed for their electrochemical characterisation using techniques such as Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) and transistor-based impedance spectroscopy. In this work, we combine experimental data with numerical simulation to explore the relationship between changes in SLB quality and impedance output, delving into a deeper understanding of the impedance profiles of devices with and without SLB, as well as extracted parameters such as membrane resistance (R-m). We extrapolate this approach to investigate the relationship between microelectrode area and sensor sensitivity to changes in SLB state, towards rational device design. We highlight the trend of electrode size (polymer volume) required for sensing bilayer presence as well as the dependence of the electrode sensitivity to the SLB capacitance and resistance. Finally, we illustrate how our flexible approach of including electrode and transistor measurements to amalgamate characteristic impedance spectra of transistors, overcomes the problem of low frequency noise and errors seen with traditional EIS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据