4.7 Article

Synergistic effects of catalytic co-pyrolysis Chlorella vulgaris and polyethylene mixtures using artificial neuron network: Thermodynamic and empirical kinetic analyses

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107391

关键词

Catalytic pyrolysis; Kinetic analysis; Empirical modelling; Artificial neural network; Genetic algorithm; Microalgae Chlorella vulgaris

资金

  1. Australian Govern-ment, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the kinetic and thermodynamic performances of Chlorella vulgaris, high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and their binary mixtures through catalytic pyrolysis. The results showed that the bifunctional HZSM-5/LS catalyst exhibited the best catalytic effect in the co-pyrolysis of the binary mixture.
The catalytic pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris, high-density polyethylene (Pure HDPE) and, their binary mixtures were conducted to analyse the kinetic and thermodynamic performances from 10 to 100 K/min. The kinetic parameters were computed by substituting the experimental and ANN predicted data into these iso-conversional equations and plotting linear plots. Among all the iso-conversional models, Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO) model gave the best prediction for kinetic parameters with the lowest deviation error (2.28-12.76%). The bifunctional HZSM-5/LS catalysts were found out to be the best catalysts among HZSM-5 zeolite, natural limestone (LS), and bifunctional HZSM-5/LS catalyst in co-pyrolysis of binary mixture of Chlorella vulgaris and HDPE, in which the E-a of the whole system was reduced from range 144.93-225.84 kJ/mol (without catalysts) to 75.37-76.90 kJ/mol. With the aid of artificial neuron network and genetic algorithm, an empirical model with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 51.59% was developed for tri-solid state degradation system. The developed empirical model is comparable to the thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) experimental values alongside the other empirical model proposed in literature

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据