4.7 Article

Opening magnetic hysteresis via improving the planarity of equatorial coordination by hydrogen bonding

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 51, 期 20, 页码 7986-7996

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2dt01107g

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [22131011, 22073115]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0306001]
  3. Pearl River Talent Plan of Guangdong [2017BT01C161]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2021qntd24]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By applying a mixed-ligand strategy, the structural change from a dinuclear cluster to a one-dimensional chain was achieved while maintaining the same core structure. The hydrogen bonding between the coordinated water molecules and other species leads to the adjustment of bond lengths and angles in the coordination environment, which in turn affects the magnetic behavior.
Through a mixed-ligand strategy, the structural change from a discrete dinuclear Dy-III cluster to a one-dimensional polymeric chain was achieved, maintaining the two magnetic entities with the same {Dy(dppbO(2))(2)(H2O)(5)} (dppbO(2) = 1,4-butylenebis(diphenylphosphine oxide)) core structure. Since the hydrogen bonding between the equatorial coordinated water molecules and the guests/solvents/anions is distinct, the local geometry and the equatorial planarity of the first coordination sphere of the central Dy-III ion become slightly different caused by the second coordination sphere. As a result, the dinuclear compound shows typical butterfly-shaped hysteresis loops, while it significantly opens at zero magnetic field up to 11 K for the 1D polymer, which is unprecedented in coordination polymers. Our experimental observations and theoretical analysis indicate that the hydrogen bonding leads to the fine-tuning of certain bond lengths and angles of the coordination environment, as well as the crystal field to a certain extent, revealing that the second coordination sphere affects the first coordination sphere by hydrogen bonding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据