4.5 Article

Scientific response to a cluster of shark bites

期刊

PEOPLE AND NATURE
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 963-982

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10337

关键词

acoustic tracking; human-wildlife conflict; satellite tracking; shark bite; shark provisioning; tourism

资金

  1. Australian Governments National Environmental Science Program
  2. Biopixel Oceans Foundation
  3. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland Government
  4. Slattery Family Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shark bites are a global concern, and understanding shark behavior and human activities is important for studying shark-human interactions. This article describes and evaluates the research conducted in response to a series of shark bite incidents in Cid Harbour, Queensland, Australia. Various methods were used to identify shark species, estimate abundance, and assess habitat use, as well as to understand human behavior and awareness. The study found that specific human activities, such as dumping food scraps and cleaning fish, may attract sharks to the area where people enter the water. The study concludes that eliminating these activities could reduce the risk of shark bites.
Shark bites are of high public concern globally. Information on shark occurrence and behaviour, and of the effects of human behaviours, can help understand the drivers of shark-human interactions. In Australia, a number of shark bite clusters occurred over the last decade. One of these took place in Cid Harbour the Whitsundays, Queensland, a region for which little was known about the shark community. Here, we describe and evaluate the research in response to that shark bite cluster. Fishing methods, acoustic and satellite tracking, and baited remote underwater video cameras (BRUVs) were used to identify the shark species using Cid Harbour, estimate relative abundance, and describe habitat use and residency. Side-scan sonar and BRUVs were also used to assess prey availability. Recreational users were surveyed to understand human behaviour and their awareness and perceptions of 'Shark Smart' behaviours. This allowed shark occurrence and behaviour to be interpreted in the context of human behaviours in the Harbour. Eleven shark species were identified. Relative abundance was not unusually high, and residency in Cid Harbour was typically low. For example, 79% of acoustically tagged sharks visited the harbour on <10% days at liberty. Shark prey was available year-round. Notably, anchored boats regularly conduct activities that can attract sharks (dumping food scraps, provisioning and cleaning fish). Alone, the methods used in this study had variable success, but combined they provided a large amount of complementary information. Including a social science component in the research response to the shark bite incidents allowed for a more holistic understanding of the Cid Harbour bite incidents. This study did not identify anything unusual about the shark community that could have contributed to the Cid Harbour shark bite cluster. However, the three incidents involved people bitten almost instantly after entering the water, which is unusual and suggests that feeding/attracting sharks to boats could have been a contributor and also that any species capable of biting humans could have been responsible. The eradication of activities that attract sharks to areas where people enter the water may reduce shark bite risk. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据