4.7 Article

Nonlinear effects in the black hole ringdown: Absorption-induced mode excitation

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 105, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.064046

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC Discovery grant
  2. CIFAR
  3. Government of Canada through the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
  4. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Colleges and Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates a nonlinear effect during the ringdown process, namely the absorption-induced mode excitation, which is found to be the dominant nonlinear effect. The study shows that this effect occurs within the nonadiabatic regime and proposes an estimation technique.
Gravitational-wave observations of black hole ringdowns are commonly used to characterize binary merger remnants and to test general relativity. These analyses assume linear black hole perturbation theory, in particular that the ringdown can be described in terms of quasinormal modes even for times approaching the merger. Here we investigate a nonlinear effect during the ringdown, namely how a mode excited at early times can excite additional modes as it is absorbed by the black hole. This is a third-order secular effect: the change in the black hole mass causes a shift in the mode spectrum, so that the original mode is projected onto the new ones. Using nonlinear simulations, we study the ringdown of a spherically symmetric scalar field around an asymptotically anti-de Sitter black hole, and we find that this absorption-induced mode excitation is the dominant nonlinear effect. We show that this effect takes place well within the nonadiabatic regime, so we can analytically estimate it using a sudden mass-change approximation. Adapting our estimation technique to asymptotically flat Schwarzschild black holes, we expect absorptioninduced mode excitation to play a role in the analysis and interpretation of current and future gravitational wave observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据