4.5 Article

Potential vorticity of the south polar vortex of Venus

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS
卷 121, 期 4, 页码 574-593

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JE004885

关键词

-

资金

  1. ASI [I/050/10/0]
  2. Spanish project [AYA2012-36666]
  3. FEDER
  4. Grupos Gobierno Vasco [IT-765-13]
  5. Universidad Pais Vasco UPV/EHU [UFI11/55]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Venus' atmosphere shows highly variable warm vortices over both of the planet's poles. The nature of the mechanism behind their formation and properties is still unknown. Potential vorticity is a conserved quantity when advective processes dominate over friction and diabatic heating and is a quantity frequently used to model balanced flows. As a step toward understanding the vortices' dynamics, we present maps of Ertel's potential vorticity (EPV) at Venus' south polar region. We analyze three configurations of the south polar vortex at the upper cloud level (P similar to 240 mbar; z similar to 58 km), based on our previous analyses of cloud motions and thermal structure from data acquired by the Visual and InfraRed Thermal Imaging Spectrometer instrument on board Venus Express. Additionally, we tentatively estimate EPV at the lower cloud level (P similar to 2200 mbar; z similar to 43km), based on our previous wind measurements and on static stability data from Pioneer Venus and the Venus International Reference Atmosphere (VIRA) model. Values of EPV are on the order of 10(-6) and 10(-8) Km(2) kg(-1) s(-1) at the upper and lower cloud levels, respectively, being 3 times larger than the estimated errors. The morphology observed in EPV maps is mainly determined by the structures of the vertical component of the relative vorticity. This is in contrast to the vortex's morphology observed in 3.8 or 5 mu m images which are related to the thermal structure of the atmosphere at the cloud top. Some of the EPV maps point to a weak ringed structure in the upper cloud, while a more homogenous EPV field is found in the lower cloud.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据