4.5 Review

Analysis of impact crater populations and the geochronology of planetary surfaces in the inner solar system

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS
卷 121, 期 10, 页码 1900-1926

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JE005094

关键词

crater statistics; chronology; planetary surfaces

资金

  1. NASA [NNX14AG56G, NNX14AR88G, NNX14AR93G, NNX15AM40G]
  2. NASA [683835, NNX15AM40G, 800228, NNX14AG56G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analyzing the density of impact craters on planetary surfaces is the only known technique for learning their ages remotely. As a result, crater statistics have been widely analyzed on the terrestrial planets, since the timing and rates of activity are critical to understanding geologic process and history. On the Moon, the samples obtained by the Apollo and Luna missions provide critical calibration points for cratering chronology. On Mercury, Venus, and Mars, there are no similarly firm anchors for cratering rates, but chronology models have been established by extrapolating from the lunar record or by estimating their impactor fluxes in other ways. This review provides a current perspective on crater population measurements and their chronological interpretation. Emphasis is placed on how ages derived from crater statistics may be contingent on assumptions that need to be considered critically. In addition, ages estimated from crater populations are somewhat different than ages from more familiar geochronology tools (e.g., radiometric dating). Resurfacing processes that remove craters from the observed population are particularly challenging to account for, since they can introduce geologic uncertainty into results or destroy information about the formation age of a surface. Regardless of these challenges, crater statistics measurements have resulted in successful predictions later verified by other techniques, including the age of the lunar maria, the existence of a period of heavy bombardment in the Moon's first billion years, and young volcanism on Mars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据