4.8 Review

Geoinspired syntheses of materials and nanomaterials

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 51, 期 11, 页码 4828-4866

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cs01283a

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) Consolidator Grant GENESIS under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [864850]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [864850] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The search for new materials is closely related to the development of synthesis methods. Taking inspiration from natural processes, particularly geological systems, has shown to be a promising approach. This review explores the concept of geoinspiration for the design and synthesis of new materials, highlighting its potential for uncovering novel synthesis pathways and materials.
The search for new materials is intimately linked to the development of synthesis methods. In the current urge for the sustainable synthesis of materials, taking inspiration from Nature's ways to process matter appears as a virtuous approach. In this review, we address the concept of geoinspiration for the design of new materials and the exploration of new synthesis pathways. In geoinspiration, materials scientists take inspiration from the key features of various geological systems and processes occurring in nature, to trigger the formation of artificial materials and nanomaterials. We discuss several case studies of materials and nanomaterials to highlight the basic geoinspiration concepts underlying some synthesis methods: syntheses in water and supercritical water, thermal shock syntheses, molten salt synthesis and high pressure synthesis. We show that the materials emerging from geoinspiration exhibit properties differing from materials obtained by other pathways, thus demonstrating that the field opens up avenues to new families of materials and nanomaterials. This review focuses on synthesis methodologies, by drawing connections between geosciences and materials chemistry, nanosciences, green chemistry, and environmental sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据