4.4 Article

Density Functional Theory Study on the Mechanism of Organophos-phine-Catalyzed [4+2] Cycloaddition Reaction

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 830-837

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.6023/cjoc202109022

关键词

organophosphine catalysis; reaction mechanism; density functional theory; stereoselectivity; substituent effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22003045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, density functional theory calculations were performed on the mechanism of a phosphine-catalyzed cycloaddition reaction. The predicted enantioselectivity results were consistent with experimental findings, and the substituent effects concerning the diene substrate were explored.
Organophosphine-catalyzed cycloaddition reaction provides an efficient method for the construction of valuable heterocycles. In this article, density functional theory calculations were performed on the mechanism of a phosphine-catalyzed [4 +2] cycloaddition between conjugated dienes and enones reported recently. The overall reaction consisted of four sequential processes, namely the formation of the zwitterionic intennediate, intermolecular nucleophilic addition, intramolecular cyclization, and removal of the organophosphine. The activation free-energy barrier was estimated to be 84.4 kJ/mol, and the overall free-energy change was computed to be -18.8 kJ/mol. For the asymmetric variant of the reaction, the predicted enantioselectivity results were consistent with experimental findings, and what's more, a distortional strain model was proposed to understand the observed enantioselectivity. Lastly, the substituent effects concerning the diene substrate were explored, which revealed that an ester group on the C(2) position would exert a much stronger influent on the reactivity than that on the C(1) position. The conclusions drawn in this work can help organic chemists to optimize experimental conditions and design new reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据