4.7 Article

Impact of sol aging on TiO2 compact layer and photovoltaic performance of perovskite solar cell

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-MATERIALS
卷 59, 期 9, 页码 710-718

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40843-016-5099-1

关键词

perovskite solar cells; TiO2 sol; compact layer; aging time

资金

  1. Thousands Talents program for pioneer researcher and his innovation team, China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51374029, 91433102]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in the University [NCET-13-0668]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-TP-14-008C1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perovskite solar cells are known to have a power conversion efficiency dependent on subtle variation in chemical composition and crystal and microstructures of materials, processing conditions, and device fabrication procedures and conditions. The present work demonstrates such strong dependence of power conversion efficiency on a TiO2 film made of the same sol with various aging time. A dense and conformal TiO2 film was prepared by sol-gel method, and the influences of its surface morphology and thickness on performance of perovskite solar cells have been investigated. The surface morphology and thickness of the TiO2 film were tuned by adjusting the aging time of sol, resulting in enhanced short-circuit current density and fill factor of the perovskite solar cells due to increased coverage and roughness of perovskite films, light refraction, and effective charge recombination blocking effect, which were verified by means of the light absorption spectra, photoluminescence of perovskite films with and without hole transport layer, cyclic voltammogram, and electrochemical impedance spectra. The cells with a dense and conformal TiO2 compact layer derived fromthe sol aged for 4 h exhibit a power conversion efficiency of 15.7%, 50% higher than the efficiency based on TiO2 layer derived from 0 h aging sol and 3 times of the efficiency with TiO2 layer made from 8 h aged sol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据