4.5 Article

The Early Immune Response of Lymphoid and Myeloid Head-Kidney Cells of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Stimulated with Aeromonas salmonicida

期刊

FISHES
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fishes7010012

关键词

Aeromonas; NF-kappa B; myeloid; inflammatory; innate immune response; rainbow trout

资金

  1. European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF)
  2. Ministry of Agriculture and the Environment of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany [MV-II.1-LM-004]
  3. Open Access Fund of the Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN)
  4. Scholarship Becas Chile-DAAD: Doctoral scholarship
  5. bilateral agreement abroad CONICYT-DAAD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the immune response of rainbow trout to bacterial stimulation was examined by analyzing the gene expression patterns of different cell subpopulations in the head kidney. The results provide insights into the regulation of key genes involved in fish immune response to bacterial infection and their diagnostic significance.
The teleost head kidney is a highly relevant immune organ, and myeloid cells play a major role in this organ's innate and adaptive immune responses. Because of their complexity, the early phases of the innate immune reaction of fish against bacteria are still poorly understood. In this study, naive rainbow trout were stimulated with inactivated A. salmonicida and sampled at 12 h, 24 h and 7 d poststimulation. Cells from the head kidney were magnetically sorted with a monoclonal antibody mAB21 to obtain one (MAb21-positive) fraction enriched with myeloid cells and one (MAb21-negative) fraction enriched with lymphocytes and thrombocytes. The gene expression pattern of the resulting cell subpopulations was analysed using a panel of 43 immune-related genes. The results show an overall downregulation of the complement pathway and cytokine production at the considered time points. Some of the selected genes may be considered as parameters for diagnosing bacterial furunculosis of rainbow trout.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据