4.6 Review

Medical interventions for chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012979.pub3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, USA [1 R01 HL133006-01]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1 R01 HL133006-01]
  3. National Institute for Health Research, UK
  4. National Institute for Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review aimed to compare the effects of different medical interventions in patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic rhinosinusitis. However, no eligible trials were found. High-quality trials are needed to assess the efficacy of these interventions in managing chronic rhinosinusitis, preventing pulmonary exacerbations, and improving quality of life in cystic fibrosis patients.
Background Chronic rhinosinusitis frequently occurs in people with cystic fibrosis. Several medical interventions are available for treating chronic rhinosinusitis in people with cystic fibrosis; for example, different concentrations of nasal saline irrigations, topical or oral corticosteroids, antibiotics - including nebulized antibiotics - dornase alfa and modulators of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) (such as lumacaftor, ivacaftor or tezacaftor). However, the efficacy of these interventions is unclear. This is an update of a previously published review. Objectives The objective of this review is to compare the effects of different medical interventions in people diagnosed with cystic fibrosis and chronic rhinosinusitis. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and hand searching of journals and conference abstract books. Date of last search of trials register: 09 September 2021. We also searched ongoing trials databases, other medical databases and the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. Date of latest additional searches: 22 November 2021. Selection criteria Randomized and quasi-randomized trials of different medical interventions compared to each other or to no intervention or to placebo. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed trials identified for potential inclusion in the review. We planned to conduct data collection and analysis in accordance with Cochrane methods and to independently rate the quality of the evidence for each outcome using the GRADE guidelines. Main results We identified no trials that met the pre-defined inclusion criteria. The most recent searches identified 44 new references, none of which were eligible for inclusion in the current version of this review; 12 studies are listed as excluded and one as ongoing. Authors' conclusions We identified no eligible trials assessing the medical interventions in people with cystic fibrosis and chronic rhinosinusitis. High-quality trials are needed which should assess the efficacy of different treatment options detailed above for managing chronic rhinosinusitis, preventing pulmonary exacerbations and improving quality of life in people with cystic fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据