4.5 Article

A hydrogel based on nanocellulose/polydopamine/gelatin used for the treatment of MRSA infected wounds with broad-spectrum antibacterial and antioxidant properties and tissue suitability

期刊

BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 3174-3187

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2bm00157h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of Jiangsu Province of China [BE2019738]
  2. Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200327]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel hydrogel with broad-spectrum antibacterial abilities and good antioxidant performance has been successfully synthesized in this study. The hydrogel can effectively promote cell proliferation and accelerate the healing of infected wounds. This new approach provides further solutions for clinical wound dressings.
Most wound dressings encounter a series of problems when dealing with the bacterial infection of wounds, for example, the antibacterial and antioxidant capacities, comfort, and mechanical properties are not suitable to meet clinical requirements. Here, we synthesized epsilon-polylysine-grafted nanocellulose (NCF-EPL) and polydopamine (PDA) nanoparticles and embedded them in genipin-cross-linked gelatin to prepare a hydrogel (NCF-EPL/GTP/PDA). In this system, the embedded NCF-EPL and PDA interact with the gelatin matrix to form a hydrogel with excellent physical properties. The hydrogel has broad-spectrum antibacterial abilities and good antioxidant performance, and it can effectively promote cell proliferation. Full-thickness MRSA-infected skin wound healing experiments clearly show that the NCF-EPL/GTP/PDA hydrogel can significantly accelerate the healing of infected wounds via killing bacteria and reducing inflammation, and secondary damage caused by adhesion during dressing use is effectively avoided. In short, the hydrogel provides a new method for overcoming the shortcomings of traditional dressings, and this approach provides further solutions for the selection of clinical dressings for healing wounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据