4.0 Review

Ten Years of Research on the Water-Energy-Food Nexus: An Analysis of Topics Evolution

期刊

FRONTIERS IN WATER
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/frwa.2022.859891

关键词

water-energy-food nexus; WEF nexus; WEF nexus governance; policy integration; topic modeling analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the evolution of the concept and research on the water-energy-food (WEF) nexus over time. The findings indicate that the nexus approach is increasingly becoming an integrative concept, incorporating new topics and methods for interdisciplinary and inter-sectoral analyses.
This study explores how the concept and research on the water-energy-food (WEF) nexus has evolved over time. The research uncovers the key terms underpinning the phenomenon, maps the interlinkages between WEF nexus topics, and provides an overview of the evolution of the concept of WEF nexus. We analyzed published academic literature from the Scopus database and performed both qualitative and quantitative analyses using Natural Language Processing method. The findings suggest that the nexus approach is increasingly evolving into an integrative concept, and has been incorporating new topics over time, resulting in different methods for WEF nexus research, with a focus on interdisciplinary and inter-sectoral analyses. Through the five periods outlined, we have identified the nexus approach debate focused on the following predominant topics: i) Trend 1 (2012-2016) debates on WEF nexus for water management and natural resource security, ii) Trend 2 (2017-2018) linkages between the nexus, the sustainable development goals and green economy, iii) Trend 3 (2019) WEF nexus governance and policy integration, iv) Trend 4 (2020) application of the nexus concept on different scales, including regions, countries, watersheds, urban areas as well as other components coupled to the WEF nexus, and, v) Trend 5 (2021) climate change and urban nexus challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据