4.6 Article

Temperature and environmental degradation: an international evidence

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/20964129.2022.2074896

关键词

Temperature; corruption; energy consumption; services sector; simultaneous equations modeling

资金

  1. Ho Chi Minh City Open University [E2022.1.01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the direct and indirect effects of temperature on environmental degradation and finds that corruption harms economic growth in middle-income countries. Furthermore, the continued use of fossil fuel energy consumption deteriorates environmental quality while the services sector plays a critical role in supporting economic growth and improving environmental quality.
Introduction The effects of temperature have largely been under-examined in climate change studies. This study examines both direct and indirect effects of temperature on environmental degradation using the sample of 103 middle-income countries from 1985 to 2019. Unlike previous studies in which a single equation approach is utilized, our study considers the simultaneous equations modelling to examine the energy-growth-environment nexus incorporating temperature and corruption. The difference and system generalized method of moments estimations for panel data are used. Outcomes Empirical results from this paper confirm both the direct and indirect effects (via energy consumption) of temperature on environmental degradation. We find corruption harms economic growth in middle-income countries. The continued use of fossil fuel energy in energy consumption deteriorates environmental quality. Our findings confirm the critical role of the services sector in supporting economic growth and reducing emerging consumption, leading to increased environmental quality. Conclusion Findings from our study reconfirm the vital role of renewable energy and its extended use in achieving dual objectives of supporting economic growth and improving the environmental quality in middle-income countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据