4.6 Article

In situ reconfiguration of plasma-engineered copper electrodes towards efficient electrocatalytic hydrogenation

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 4032-4039

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cy00248e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22175077, 22088101, 21773093]
  2. National Major Research and Development Plan [2018YFA0209402]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2021A1515012351]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering [202114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defect engineering of Cu electrodes via plasma treatment boosts the kinetics of electrocatalytic hydrogenation, enabling the efficient conversion of furfural to furfuryl alcohol. The high Faradaic efficiency of the process is attributed to the quick in situ reduction of CuOx to Cu with rich defects and high roughness.
As a new route for biomass upgrading, electrocatalytic hydrogenation (ECH) requires a catalyst surface/subsurface that optimizes intermediate chemisorption towards target pathways. Defect engineering of Cu electrodes via plasma treatment is herein introduced to accomplish the efficient ECH of furfural (FAL) to furfuryl alcohol (FOL), thanks to the boosted kinetics on in situ reconfigured and defective Cu. Our experimental and theoretical analysis points out that the rate of ECH is positively correlated with the difference between the binding energies of chemisorbed H and FAL regarding their competitive adsorption, and thereby the higher discrepancy on defective Cu enables fast ECH in comparison with defect-free Cu. O-2-plasma treatment on Cu foil (OP-Cu) produces CuOx that quickly undergoes in situ reduction to Cu with high roughness and rich defects during the initial ECH. Thereby, OP-Cu affords a high Faradaic efficiency (91%) of FOL at -0.56 V vs. RHE, superior to that of electropolished or Ar-plasma treated Cu. Its high efficacy identified in a wide substrate scope further enlightens catalyst design for electrochemical refinery via dynamic control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据