4.7 Article

Regularized Tapered Sample Covariance Matrix

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 2306-2320

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2022.3169269

关键词

Sample covariance matrix; shrinkage; regularization; elliptically symmetric distributions; tapering; banding; sphericity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the problem of covariance matrix estimation in high-dimensional settings and proposes a new estimator called TABASCO. By shrinking the tapered sample covariance matrix, more accurate estimation results can be obtained. Simulation studies and practical application results demonstrate that TABASCO outperforms other competing estimators in various scenarios.
Covariance matrix tapers have a long history in signal processing and related fields. Examples of applications include autoregressive models (promoting a banded structure) or beam-forming (widening the spectral null width associated with an interferer). In this paper, the focus is on high-dimensional setting where the dimension p is high, while the data aspect ratio n/p is low. We propose an estimator called TABASCO (TApered or BAnded Shrinkage COvariance matrix) that shrinks the tapered sample covariance matrix towards a scaled identity matrix. We derive optimal and estimated (data adaptive) regularization parameters that are designed to minimize the mean squared error (MSE) between the proposed shrinkage estimator and the true covariance matrix. These parameters are derived under the general assumption that the data is sampled from an unspecified elliptically symmetric distribution with finite 4th order moments (both real-and complex-valued cases are addressed). Simulation studies show that the proposed TABASCO outperforms all competing tapering covariance matrix estimators in diverse setups. An application to space-time adaptive processing (STAP) also illustrates the benefit of the proposed estimator in a practical signal processing setup.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据