4.7 Article

Carbon nanofiber yarns fabricated from co-electrospun nanofibers

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 591-598

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.132

关键词

Electrospinning; Carbon nanofiber yarn; C/Cu composite nanofiber; Electrical conductivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51203196, U1204510]
  2. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province of China [15HASTIT024]
  3. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Group in Universities of Henan Province of China [16IRTSTHN006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three different nanofiber yarns with various structures are first fabricated using a custom-made, coaxial, conjugate, electrospinning set-up. These yarns are then subjected to thermal stabilization and carbonization to obtain polyacrylonitrile-based carbon nanofiber yarns (PAN-based CNY), PAN/poly(methyl methacrylate)-based carbon nanofiber yarns (PAN/PMMA-based CNY), and C/Cu composite nanofiber yarns. The structures of the three CNYs are characterized using scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. The electrical conductivity of the samples is measured using a four-point probe method. In the case of the PAN-based CNY, the fibers strongly adhere to each other and eventually fracture, making the individual fibers no longer distinguishable from each other. On the other hand, the PAN/PMMA-based CNY and C/Cu composite nanofiber yarns are composed of independent fibers that are well oriented. Moreover, for the C/Cu composite nanofiber yarn, a nanowire composed of Cu nanoparticles is observed along the central axis of these fibers. In addition, Cu nanoparticles uniformly adhere to the surfaces of these fibers. Compared to the PAN-based CNY, the electrical conductivity of the C/Cu composite nanofiber yarns is significantly higher. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据