4.6 Article

Mitral Annulus Segmentation and Anatomical Orientation Detection in TEE Images Using Periodic 3D CNN

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 51472-51486

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3174059

关键词

Three-dimensional displays; Heart valves; Image segmentation; Convolutional neural networks; Probes; Valves; Task analysis; Deep learning; earth mover's distance; echocardiography; landmark detection; mitral annulus segmentation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a robust 3D method for predicting the anatomical orientation and segmentation of the mitral annulus. The method combines the circular anatomy with cylinder coordinate samples and a 3D convolutional neural network. New landmark detection loss functions based on earth mover's distance are also introduced. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated through training and evaluation, showing its potential in easing clinicians' workload and saving time in clinics.
Segmentation of the mitral annulus is often an important step in cardiac examinations. We propose a robust 3D method for predicting the anatomical orientation and segmentation of the mitral annulus in 3D transesophageal echocardiography. The method takes advantage of the circular anatomy of the annulus by utilizing cylinder coordinate samples and a 3D convolutional neural network with circular convolutions. Furthermore, the paper proposes new landmark detection loss functions based on the earth mover's distance. The method's effectiveness was demonstrated by training a HighRes3dNet model and evaluating its performance on a separate test set consisting of 135 frames from 19 examinations. The obtained coordinate prediction error was 1.96 +/- 1.62 mm, and the anatomical orientation prediction error was 9.7 degrees +/- 15.8 degrees. The robust and fully automatic mitral annulus segmentation and orientation prediction provided by the method can ease the workload of clinicians and provide time savings in clinics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据