4.8 Review

Manganese-catalyzed hydrogenation, dehydrogenation, and hydroelementation reactions

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 51, 期 11, 页码 4386-4464

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cs00093h

关键词

-

资金

  1. IISER Kolkata
  2. CSIR [02(0405)/21/EMR-II]
  3. CSIR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emerging field of organometallic catalysis has shifted towards research on Earth-abundant transition metals. Manganese has emerged as one of the leading competitors, playing an important role in hydrogenation, dehydrogenation, and hydroelementation reactions. Catalyst design is based on metal-ligand bifunctionality, ligand hemilability, and redox activity, resulting in different turnover numbers for product molecules.
The emerging field of organometallic catalysis has shifted towards research on Earth-abundant transition metals due to their ready availability, economic advantage, and novel properties. In this case, manganese, the third most abundant transition-metal in the Earth's crust, has emerged as one of the leading competitors. Accordingly, a large number of molecularly-defined Mn-complexes has been synthesized and employed for hydrogenation, dehydrogenation, and hydroelementation reactions. In this regard, catalyst design is based on three pillars, namely, metal-ligand bifunctionality, ligand hemilability, and redox activity. Indeed, the developed catalysts not only differ in the number of chelating atoms they possess but also their working principles, thereby leading to different turnover numbers for product molecules. Hence, the critical assessment of molecularly defined manganese catalysts in terms of chelating atoms, reaction conditions, mechanistic pathway, and product turnover number is significant. Herein, we analyze manganese complexes for their catalytic activity, versatility to allow multiple transformations and their routes to convert substrates to target molecules. This article will also be helpful to get significant insight into ligand design, thereby aiding catalysis design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据