Management of vertebral compression fractures: the role of dual-energy CT in clinical practice

Purpose To evaluate the role of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in the management of vertebral compression fractures in clinical practice. Materials and methods This retrospective IRB-approved study included 497 consecutive patients with suspected acute vertebral fractures, imaged either by DECT (group 1) or MRI (group 2) before vertebroplasty. The site, number and type of fractures at imaging findings, and clinical outcome based on any change in pain (DELTA-VAS), before (VAS-pre) and after treatment (VAS-post), were determined and compared. Two radiologists evaluated DECT and MRI images (15 and 5 years of experience, respectively), and inter-observer and intra-observer agreement were calculated using k statistics. Results Both in the control group (n = 124) and in the group of patients treated by vertebroplasty (n = 373), the clinical outcome was not influenced by the imaging approach adopted, with a DELTA-VAS of 5.45 and 6.42 in the DECT group and 5.12 and 6.65 in the MRI group (p = 0.326; p = 0.44). In the group of treated patients, sex, age, lumbar fractures, multiple fractures, previous fractures, Genant grade, involvement of anterior apex or superior endplates, and increased spinal curvatures were similar (p = ns); however, dorsal fractures were more prevalent in group 1 (p = 0.0197). Before treatment, the mean VAS-pre was 8.74 in group 1 (DECT) and 8.65 in group 2 (MRI) (p = 0.301), whereas after treatment, the mean VAS-post value was 2.32 in group 1 (p = 0.0001), and 2.00 in group 2 (p = 0.0001). The DELTA-VAS was 6.42 in the group of patients imaged using DECT and 6.65 in the group imaged using MRI (p = 0.326). Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement were 0.85 and 0.89 for DECT, and 0.88 and 0.91 for MRI, respectively. Conclusion The outcome of vertebral compression fracture management was no different between the two groups of patients studied.

Automated summary

The role of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in the management of vertebral compression fractures was evaluated and compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The study found no significant difference in clinical outcomes and pain relief between the two imaging approaches.