4.7 Article

Momentary click nitrile synthesis enabled by an aminoazanium reagent

期刊

ORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 9, 期 13, 页码 3420-3427

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2qo00560c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22022113]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel nitrile synthesis method was reported, which efficiently converts functionalized aldehydes to nitriles within 5 minutes at room temperature by utilizing a stable and robust aminoazanium reagent. The stability and speed of this method make the CHO group equivalent to CN in organic synthesis, and it can also be used for direct cyanation of various aldehyde precursors through a cyanide-free process. The developed method not only provides a rapid access to a wide range of ligands and material precursors, but also offers a potential application for the late-stage modification of complex bioactive molecules.
Achieving fast and selective functional group interconversion is crucial for improving synthetic efficiency in chemical science nowadays. In this context, we report momentary and selective Schmidt-type nitrile synthesis. The success of this achievement is ascribed to the employment of the stable and robust aminoazanium reagent H2N-DABCO. A broad range of functionalized aldehydes were efficiently converted to nitriles within 5 min at room temperature in air. The robustness and speed of the protocol allow the CHO group to be regarded as a CN equivalent in organic synthesis. Moreover, the synthetic advantage of this developed protocol is further highlighted via the direct cyanation of a diversity of aldehyde precursors (carboxylic acids, aromatics, aryl halides, alkenes, and alkynes) in a cyanide-free process. Additionally, we show that this protocol can not only be used for rapid access to a wide range of ligands and material precursors, but it can also be used in the late-stage modification of complex bioactive molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据