4.6 Review

Nature-inspired materials and designs for flexible lithium-ion batteries

期刊

CARBON ENERGY
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 878-900

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cey2.187

关键词

bioinspired materials; flexibility; lithium-ion batteries; structural design

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21875040, 21905051]
  2. Macau Science and Technology Development Fund [FDCT-0035/2019/AMJ, FDCT-0057/2019/A1, FDCT0092/2019/A2pt>]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes novel flexible lithium-ion batteries inspired by natural and biological materials, discussing their design concepts and future development directions.
Flexible lithium-ion batteries (FLBs) are of critical importance to the seamless power supply of flexible and wearable electronic devices. However, the simultaneous acquirements of mechanical deformability and high energy density remain a major challenge for FLBs. Through billions of years of evolutions, many plants and animals have developed unique compositional and structural characteristics, which enable them to have both high mechanical deformability and robustness to cope with the complex and stressful environment. Inspired by nature, many new materials and designs emerge recently to achieve mechanically flexible and high storage capacity of lithium-ion batteries at the same time. Here, we summarize these novel FLBs inspired by natural and biological materials and designs. We first give a brief introduction to the fundamentals and challenges of FLBs. Then, we highlight the latest achievements based on nature inspiration, including fiber-shaped FLBs, origami and kirigami-derived FLBs, and the nature-inspired structural designs in FLBs. Finally, we discuss the current status, remaining challenges, and future opportunities for the development of FLBs. This concise yet focused review highlights current inspirations in FLBs and wishes to broaden our view of FLB materials and designs, which can be directly borrowed from nature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据