4.7 Article

Micro-alloying with Mn in Zn-Mg alloy for future biodegradable metals application

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 95-104

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.128

关键词

Biodegradable metals; Zn-Mg-Mn alloys; Mechanical properties; In vitro degradation; Hemocompatibility

资金

  1. Lepu Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zn as a novel biodegradable metal holds great potential in bioresorbable implant application since it possesses excellent biocompatibility and more corrosion resistant than Mg. In the present study, the effect of the micro-alloying element Mn on the Zn-Mg alloy was studied with mechanical properties, in vitro degradation behaviors and hemocompatibility being evaluated in comparison with pure Zn as control. The experimental Zn-Mg-Mn alloys were composed of the matrix Zn and secondary phase (MgZn2). Meanwhile, Zn-Mg-Mn alloys ingots exhibited much higher yield strength (YS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and hardness compared to pure Zn. But their elongation was reduced. The results of immersion in Hank's solution for 30 days revealed that the sequence of corrosion rates from high to low was: as-cast Zn-1Mg-0.1Mn alloy > as-cast Zn-1.5Mg-0.1Mn alloy > pure Zn. The consequences of electrochemical tests indicated that the calculated corrosion rates followed the ranking order: as-cast Zn-1Mg-0.1Mn alloy > as-cast Zn-1.5Mg-0.1Mn alloy > pure Zn. The results of hemolysis rate and platelet adhesion implied that the studied alloys had good blood compatibility. Furthermore, after hot-rolling, the YS, UTS, elongation and hardness of Zn-1Mg-0.1Mn alloys were further improved and possessed the superior mechanics performance (YS 195.02 MPa, UTS 299.04 MPa, Elongation 26.07%, Hardness 107.82 Hv), appropriate corrosion rate (V-corr 0.25 mm/year) and excellent hemocompatibility (hemolysis rate of 1.10% and no signs of thrombogenicity), showing the preferable candidate as a biodegradable implant material. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据